tsmithjohnson (tsmithjohnson) wrote,
tsmithjohnson
tsmithjohnson

L. C. ANDERSON HIGH SCHOOL TRIBUTE 19: 1954 YELLOWJACKETS YEARBOOK: FAVORITES & "12 ANGRY MEN"

MY SELECTION NO. 19  FOR "BEST MOVIES OF THE FIFTIES"  IS "12 ANGRY MEN" STARRING "HENRY FONDA", "LEE J. COBB", "E. G. MARSHALL",
"ED BEGLEY", AND, "JACK WARDEN"!!



12 Angry Men is a 1957 American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose.[4][5] Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous. The film is notable for its almost exclusive use of one set: out of 96 minutes of run time, only three minutes take place outside of the jury room. 12 Angry Men explores many techniques of consensus-building and the difficulties encountered in the process, among a group of men whose range of personalities adds intensity and conflict. No names are used in the film: the jury members are identified by number until two of them exchange names at the very end, the defendant is referred to as "the boy" and the witnesses as "the old man" and "the lady across the street". In 2007, the film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".[6] The film was selected as the second-best courtroom drama ever by the American Film Institute during their AFI's 10 Top 10 list[7] and is the highest courtroom drama on Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 Movies of All Time.[8] Plot - In a New York City courthouse a jury commences deliberating the case of an 18-year-old boy from a slum, on trial for allegedly stabbing his father to death. If there is any reasonable doubt they are to return a verdict of not guilty. If found guilty, the boy will receive a death sentence. In a preliminary vote, all jurors vote "guilty" except Juror 8, who argues that the boy deserves some deliberation. This irritates some of the other jurors, who are impatient for a quick deliberation, especially Juror 7 who has tickets to the evening's Yankee game and Juror 10, who demonstrates blatant prejudice against people from slums. Juror 8 questions the accuracy and reliability of the only two witnesses and the prosecution's claim that the murder weapon, a common switchblade (of which he possesses an identical copy), was "rare." Juror 8 argues that reasonable doubt exists and that he therefore cannot in conscience vote "guilty," but concedes that he has merely hung the jury.

*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************

LET'S CONTINUE OUR STROLL DOWN MEMORY LANE WITH
THE 1954 L. C. ANDERSON HIGH SCHOOL FAVORITES!!







Tags: #austintexas, #instagram, #linkedin, #twitter, 1950-1959, african history/culture, american history/culture, austin texas, black american history/culture, civil rights leaders, education-teachers issues, facebook, flickr, google+, i love my family, instagram, international/world news, jf dobie bpa, l c anderson high, linkedin, livejournal, naacp, periscope, pinterest, skype, texas history/culture, tumblr, twitter
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments